Large Language Models are powerful tools for text generation, but they introduce structural risks when used in safety-critical or regulated environments.

Large Language Models are powerful tools for text generation, but they introduce structural risks when used in safety-critical or regulated environments under ISO 26262 and SOTIF.
In domains such as automotive, aerospace, and defense, systems must be deterministic, verifiable, traceable, and certifiable. This is why purely statistical AI approaches struggle in these contexts.
Model-based, symbolic, and declarative AI approaches can transform natural language into formal representations that allow reasoning, verification, and compliance with safety standards.
The future of AI in regulated industries is not about replacing engineering rigor. It is about restoring it.
Most perception stacks reason one frame at a time. The network detects, tracking is bolted on afterwards, and the system never really carries the world forward. A snapshot machine cannot validate cleanly, because the thing that would make its output trustworthy is the thing it discards between frames: continuity.
Gödel's incompleteness theorem, Hume's induction problem, the halting problem, and AI hallucination are not isolated failures of reason. They point to the same missing term: context.
Most ADAS perception stacks classify what they already know. The real world is combinatorial, contextual, and full of unknowns. Semantic fallback systems are needed when flat object lists fail.